Loading...
Loading...
Release, inspection and repair for AI agents
We check each agent against what you signed, on a schedule and on every change. A fix drafted when one fails. Your team releases. Salesforce and Agentforce first.
Your approvals, your Git, your release.
Another team widens a permission. Someone edits a knowledge article. The vendor swaps the model. Nobody tells the agent’s owner. Then a customer asks why it promised a delivery date.
Not what the deck said. What it did on Tuesday.
The change that broke it was never a ticket.
The model moved. Nobody was told.
| Agent | Owner | Approved to | Today | Last material change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Order desk assistant | R. Mensah, Sales Operations | v3, signed 14 Aug | Inside approval | Model swapped by vendor, 20 Oct |
| Lead response | L. Ortega, Sales Development | v2, signed 2 Jul | Outside approval | Knowledge article edited, 3 Sep |
| Quote builder | P. Achebe, Revenue Operations | v1, signed 30 May | Inside approval | Flow changed upstream, 28 Aug |
| Renewal outreach | Unassigned | Not yet approved | Not inspected | Permission widened, 12 Sep |
| Field scheduling | Unassigned | Not yet approved | Not inspected | Found by the readiness check, 1 Sep |
Illustrative sample. Private pilot. Rows change on events. Nobody has to sit and watch it.
Who owns it, what it was approved to do, whether it still does, what changed last. Nothing green by default.
A named business owner and a named platform owner. No owner is the first finding.
What your people signed, by version: outcomes, prohibited actions, escalations, limits.
Inside approval, outside approval, or not inspected. We say when we have not looked.
The last material change and its source: model, prompt, permission, knowledge article, flow.
Every answer links to its report, in your Git, readable without us.
Builders monitor their own agents. Huscribe checks them for the owner, whoever built them. The release stays yours.
Need it built, or built it and cannot get it released? We take it to a release candidate in your sandbox, your approval attached and the checks written from it. Your team releases it.
We write down what it is approved to do and check it against that, on a schedule and on every change. You see what held and what moved.
A check fails. We find the cause and draft the smallest change that would pass, evidence quoted. Your owner decides. Your team ships it. We check again.
One use case today. Agents that act on your Salesforce org, whether Huscribe built them, someone else did, or both.
Your people write down what the agent may and may not do, and sign it.
Not live? We build the candidate in your sandbox. Live? We start from what is running. Your team releases. We never deploy.
Checks run against what the agent actually did, on a schedule and on every material change.
A failure becomes a finding with the smallest change that would pass. Your owner decides. Your team ships it. We check again.
Name one agent. We come back with what it was approved to do and whether it still does.
Show us one agent ↗Prefer to see it first? Book a demo.